42%
Total operating cost reduction
310 FTEs
Redeployed to strategic activities
67%
Invoice touchless rate achieved
3.2 days
Average invoice cycle time (from 11.4)

Engagement Overview

A global manufacturer with operations across 18 countries engaged NextGen BPO to redesign their Source-to-Pay and Record-to-Report operations. The organisation faced fragmented AP processes, inconsistent vendor master governance, and limited spend visibility — resulting in ~35% non-PO invoice volume and $8M in annual late-payment penalties.

The engagement followed the Assess → Design → Transform → Operate methodology, spanning 24 months from diagnostic to steady-state BPO operations.

Engagement Details
Client Sector Manufacturing & Distribution
Geography 18 countries
Operating Cost Base ~$42M per annum
Domains in Scope Procurement · Finance
BPO Provider Tier-1 Global BPO
Programme Duration 24 months
Status Steady State — Operating
TRANSFORMATION PHASES

Phase-by-Phase Outcomes

Structured delivery across four phases, from diagnostic through to steady-state BPO operations.

01
Assess
Months 1–3
  • BPO maturity score: 38/80 — BPO Candidate band
  • No spend analytics capability identified
  • 45% non-PO invoice rate at baseline
  • Fragmented vendor master across 7 ERP instances
BPO Readiness Report with prioritised gap list delivered to SteerCo
02
Design
Months 4–8
  • Target operating model defined across AP, Contract Admin, Procurement Ops
  • 280 FTEs scoped for outsource
  • SLA framework agreed with BPO provider
  • Technology stack selected: SAP S/4HANA + Ariba
Target Operating Model document and BPO transition blueprint signed off
03
Transform
Months 9–20
  • Wave-based transition across 4 geographic clusters
  • P2P process redesign completed
  • E-invoicing rollout across top-100 suppliers
  • Vendor rationalisation: 12,400 → 6,800 active suppliers
Live BPO operations with signed-off SLAs and transition completion report
04
Operate
Months 21+
  • KPI dashboard live and integrated with client BI
  • Invoice touchless rate: 67%
  • PO compliance rate: 89%
  • Average payment terms improved by 8 days
Steady-state operations dashboard and continuous improvement register active
PERFORMANCE DATA

Operational Performance Benchmarks

Post-transformation KPI comparison — baseline vs steady-state BPO operations.

Metric Baseline Steady State Change
Invoice Processing Time 11.4 days 3.2 days ▼ 72%
PO-Based Invoice Rate 55% 89% ▲ +34pts
Invoice Exception Rate 18% 4.2% ▼ 77%
Vendor Master Active Suppliers 12,400 6,800 ▼ 45%
AP Operating Cost per Invoice $14.20 $5.90 ▼ 58%
Procurement Compliance Rate 61% 88% ▲ +27pts
Month-End Close Cycle 8.5 days 4.1 days ▼ 52%
FP&A Report Cycle Time 6.2 days 2.4 days ▼ 61%
LESSONS LEARNED & REPLICATION

What Made This Work

Executive Sponsorship

CFO and CPO co-sponsored the programme, ensuring cross-functional alignment from the outset. Governance cadence — fortnightly SteerCo with CFO attendance — maintained decision velocity and alignment throughout the transformation.

Data-First Approach

Spend analytics and vendor master cleansing were completed before any process redesign commenced. Clean, structured data enabled accurate SLA baselining and a credible, defensible business case for BPO transition.

Wave-Based Transition

Phased cutover by geography reduced transition risk and allowed lessons from early waves to be applied in later ones. Parallel-run periods for critical AP and payroll processes ensured zero service disruption throughout.

Apply This Model to Your Organisation

Use the NextGen BPO Platform to run your own maturity assessment and build a transformation roadmap based on proven methodology.